To which kind of historical questions can we find answers through a formal network analysis? Is a more fluid approach dealing with metaphorical networks more useful?
through time and across time | WordReference Forums
Which new perspectives on existing data can network research open up to different disciplines? In order to provide prospective and more advanced network scholars and students in the historical sciences with a sound background and solid arguments for structuring a network-related hypothesis, a two-day workshop is organized to:. The first day of the workshop aims at novices and prospective students in network analysis in the historical sciences and archaeology no previous knowledge required. Participants can bring own research ideas to the workshop to receive feedback, but this is not obligatory.
The second day of the workshop is devoted to in-depth theoretical discussion for advanced scholars, who already have an understanding of network concepts and are applying it to their own case studies. A general discussion will conclude the exchange within small groups focusing on specific case studies and central issues in historical and archaeological network research. Students participating in the first day are welcome to attend the second day of the workshop to broaden their understanding.
There are three points of focus for discussion on the second workshop day:.
- The Mormonizing of America: How the Mormon Religion Became a Dominant Force in Politics, Entertainment, and Pop Culture?
- Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change.
- World Cup MVPs across time | The Cricket Monthly | ESPN Cricinfo!
- “Like Cars? Like Motorcycles? Then you'll Love this Place!”?
- How to Manage a Software Development Team Across Time Zones?
- DFAT – Trade Through Time.
- over time | meaning of over time in Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English | LDOCE.
Participation in the workshop is free of charge; however, participants are required to provide for their accommodation and travel. The number of available places in the workshop is limited. To be considered for participation, prospective participants should send an abstract of their project or a statement concerning their motivation of participation about words to the workshop email address: contact-nats [at] protonmail. As the aim of this workshop is to initiate a critical discourse across disciplines, we encourage all participants to contact us if you would like to propose further topics for discussion on the second workshop day.
It invites scholars from all field of the humanities to join an interdisciplinary conversation on the promises and pitfalls of applying theories and methods from social network research to the study of structures within very diverse cultural, geographical, and historical contexts.
- Home - Wheels Through Time.
- The Sex Imperative: An Evolutionary Tale of Sexual Survival.
- Attached Files.
This platform thus offers information on the upcoming event as well as resources and posts before, during, and after this and future workshops. We are looking forward to welcoming all participants tomorrow in Mainz! The workshop program for the two days of training, discussion, and great presentations can be found here: NATS Workshop Program Icons made by Freepik from www.
Networks Across Time and Space In , the top three positions were taken by three pace bowlers. McGrath had a terrific spell of 7 for 15 against Namibia and 3 for 29 against New Zealand. In the final , against India, his 3 for 52 included Tendulkar for 4 and Mohammad Kaif for 0. Again, most of McGrath's 21 wickets were those of top-order batsmen.
Andy Bichel took 3 for 13 against Netherlands and his cameo of 19 in the semi-final against Sri Lanka was invaluable in a low-scoring game. His 7 for 20 and 34 36 against England were among the greatest bowling and all-round performances in ODI history. In the World Cup, Shane Warne was instrumental in scripting Australia's come-from-behind triumph. Warne started with 3 for 39 against Scotland and 3 for 11 against West Indies.
He finished with a magnificent 4 for 29 - one of the greatest World Cup spells - in the semi-final against South Africa in a thrilling tie, and 4 for 33 in the final against Pakistan. Most of Warne's wickets were top-order ones. McGrath had a devastating spell of 5 for 14 against West Indies and 3 for 34 against India , which included the wickets of Tendulkar for 0, Rahul Dravid for 2, and Mohammad Azharuddin for 3. He also had the key dismissal of Mark Boucher in the tied semi-final to his name.
Steve Waugh scored 62 against Zimbabwe and played an all-time great innings of against South Africa in the crucial Super Sixes match. Equally important was the 56 in the tied semi-final. He had two other scores of This was the year the lion pounced. In , Sri Lanka overcame two more favoured teams in the semi-final and final with ease. The architect of these two wins was Aravinda de Silva. However, Sanath Jayasuriya occupies the top spot with his all-round performances: 79 against India in a tough chase in the league phase, and 82 against England in the quarter-final.
De Silva's unbeaten century and three wickets against Australia in the final was one of the great all-round performances. He also had a match-winning 66 in the semi-final. However, before these knockout matches, more than half his runs were scored against Kenya. Muralitharan comes in third, for his consistency: there was no one standout performance from him. Pakistan came back from the brink to win the World Cup. Wasim Akram was the lynchpin: he took three wickets against Zimbabwe, four against New Zealand in the make-or-break league match, and three crucial wickets in the final against England, a match in which he also scored 33 off 18 balls.
Welcome to Wheels Through Time
Imran Khan scored 72 against England in the final, which set up the match. Often batting up the order, he also had other useful contributions, most of them against top teams. He also took seven wickets. Mushtaq Ahmed had figures of 3 for 59 against India, 3 for 41 against Australia, and an invaluable 3 for 41 in the final, which included the wickets of Graham Gooch and Graeme Hick. Almost all his wickets were top-order batsmen. In , the Australian team was a very different side from those that dominated the World Cup scene in the s.
This Australian side was in the process of rebuilding, and surprised everyone by winning the tournament.
The young allrounder Steve Waugh was the leading performer. He did not have a fifty or a three-wicket haul in any match, but there was no game in which he did not contribute with the bat and ball. Craig McDermott had spells of 4 for 56 and 3 for 61 against India and 5 for 44 against Pakistan. Allan Border was the third-placed player, again with no standout performance, showing how much of a team effort Australia's victory was. In it was not just a case of David slaying Goliath: it was a midget David slaying Goliath.
Kapil Dev 's all-time-great innings of off balls came against a Zimbabwe side that was similar in strength to India at that time. His 40 and 5 for 43 against Australia was a magnificent double in a losing cause, and his 3 for 35 against England in the semi-final swept away the hosts' lower order. Madan Lal took 3 for 27 against Zimbabwe in Leicester, and in the key Tunbridge Wells encounter against them he scored an important 17 and took 3 for In the final , against West Indies, he had a crucial spell of 3 for 31 and scored 17 again.
Mohinder Amarnath made critical contributions in the league stage. However, he kept his best for the knockout rounds. In the semi-final against England, he dismissed David Gower and Mike Gatting and scored an invaluable In the final, he scored a patient 26 and finished off the West Indian innings with three key wickets. Viv Richards was outstanding in the World Cup, especially in the later stages. He scored 42 and took 3 for 52 in the semi-final , against Pakistan, and then struck a magnificent in the final , versus England.
Collis King 's performance was similar in that almost everything came in the knockout matches. He bettered a lovely cameo of 34 against Pakistan in the semi-final with an outstanding 86 in the final, where he comfortably outpaced the great Richards.
Have an idea? Let's discuss!
In the final against England, he was in top flight, taking 5 for The ratings points for this tournament are low since West Indies played only four games, with their Sri Lanka match rained off. The captain, Clive Lloyd , scored a quick 53 against Pakistan and a match-winning in the final , against Australia. He also dismissed Doug Walters in that game. It was a World Cup for lesser-known allrounders. He also made 26 in the final, adding valuable runs for the last two wickets. Keith Boyce had a useful spell of 3 for 22 against Sri Lanka.
His 4 for 50 in the final was a big factor in restricting Australia. Top performers in World Cup-winning campaigns So which player has contributed most to his team's wins? In this analysis, I have presented 36 tournament-winning performances. Only one player has three entries: McGrath was the best performer for Australia in , and second best in and There is no doubt that he is the greatest contributor to the World Cup-winning cause, by a mile or two. While looking at the table above, keep in mind that these are runs scored, wickets taken, catches taken, stumpings made, and points secured in World Cup-winning campaigns only.
I have listed the top performers by aggregate rating points. McGrath's aggregate in these three World Cups is an astounding points. It is worth mentioning that in the World Cup, which Australia did not win, he secured over points. Adam Gilchrist, one of the great allrounders of the game, is in second place, with nearly points: look at the number of wicketkeeping dismissals. In a table dominated by Australian players, Yuvraj Singh stands out, having gathered nearly points in the one World Cup he played as part of a winning team.
Kapil Dev has well over points. Unfortunately the winning West Indians played in too few matches to accumulate enough points. In order to be fair to the players who won those first few World Cups, I have set out another table listing the players in the order of rating points per match.
Have an idea? Let's discuss!
The selection criterion is that the player should have played a minimum of five matches. The top four here played stellar roles in their team's campaigns. Jayasuriya's average is quite high, indicating the value he brought to the team in all three departments, as is that of de Silva, who is in fourth position. Kapil and Yuvraj's roles, in the and campaigns respectively, are among the best ever contributions to Indian cricket.
STEM Across Time Series: Racing Through Time
They exceed 75 points per match. Madan Lal provided excellent support in Australia provide a fine example of teamwork: not one of the players who participated in multiple winning campaigns finds a place here. Bichel and Lee, who played in , are the leading Australians in this table.
Related Across Time
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved